Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34067616›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

SEGHI Study: Defining the Best Surveillance Strategy in Hodgkin Lymphoma after First-Line Treatment.

Mariana Bastos Oreiro, Reyes Martín, Pilar Gomez, Nieves López Muñoz, Antonia Rodriguez, Marta Liébana, Belén Navarro, Blanca Sánchez-González, Pilar Marí, Jaime Pérez de Oteiza and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Mariana Bastos OreiroDepartment of Hematology, Gregorio Marañon Health Research Institute, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Reyes MartínDepartment of Hematology, Gregorio Marañon Health Research Institute, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-1913
Pilar GomezHematology Department, Hospital La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Nieves López MuñozHematology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Antonia RodriguezHematology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Marta LiébanaHematology Department, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Belén NavarroHematology Department, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Blanca Sánchez-GonzálezHematology Department, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar MaríHematology Department, Hospital HM Madrid Sanchinarro, Universidad CEU San Pablo, 28050 Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Pérez de OteizaHematology Department, Hospital HM Madrid Sanchinarro, Universidad CEU San Pablo, 28050 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-2037
Antonio GutiérrezHematology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Es pases (IdiSBa), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-077X
Leyre BentoHematology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Es pases (IdiSBa), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Eva Domingo DoménechHematology Department, Hospital ICO, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
María Jesús VidalHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de León, 24071 León, Spain.
Raquel Del CampoHematology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Llátzer, 07198 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Elena Pérez CeballosHematology Department, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, 30008 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-5678
María InfanteHematology Department, Hospital Infanta Leonor, 28031 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-3457
Alicia RoldánHematology Department, Hospital Infanfa Sofía, 28702 Madrid, Spain.
Daniel García BelmonteHematology Department, Hospital de La Zarzuela, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Miriam SanteroHematology Department, Hospital de Torrejón, 28850 Torrejón de Ardóz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-2787
Anna SuredaHematology Department, Hospital ICO, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón García SanzHematology Department, Hospital Clínico de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
On Behalf Of The Geltamo Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal strategy for early surveillance after first complete response is unclear in Hodgkin lymphoma. Thus, we compared the various follow-up strategies in a multicenter study. All the included patients had a negative positron emission tomography/computed tomography at the end of induction therapy. From January 2007 to January 2018, we recruited 640 patients from 15 centers in Spain. Comparing the groups in which serial imaging were performed, the clinical/analytical follow-up group was exposed to significantly fewer imaging tests and less radiation. With a median follow-up of 127 months, progression-free survival at 60 months of the entire series was 88% and the overall survival was 97%. No significant differences in survival or progression-free survival were found among the various surveillance strategies. This study suggests that follow-up approaches with imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma provide no benefits for patient survival, and we believe that clinical/analytical surveillance for this group of patients could be the best course of action.

Indexed as

follow-upHodgkin lymphomaimagessurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34067616
PMCPMC8156414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.