ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resin cement selection for different types of fixed partial coverage restorations: A narrative systematic review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Pooled it
- Does Adhesive Luting Reinforce the Mechanical Properties of Dental Ceramics Used as Restorative Materials? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2022Pooled it
- Current scenario on adhesion to zirconia; surface pretreatments and resin cements: A systematic review.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic SocietyPooled it
- The Spot-Dam Technique: A Protocol for Adhesive Cementation of BOPT Crowns.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- In Situ Formation of Calcium Zirconate Particles on the Surface of High-Translucent Zirconia: A New Way to Strongly Improve Its Bonding Properties.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Effect of 4-META and 10-MDP primers on the adhesion of resin cement to conventional and translucent polycrystalline dental ceramics.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Storage Time After Surface Treatment of Zirconia on Surface Free Energy and Bond Strength of Composite Cement.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Effect of Laser Surface Texturing on Bond Strength and Mechanical Properties of 3Y and 5Y Zirconia.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Selective Infiltration Etching as a surface modification for high-translucency zirconia: Comparative analysis of roughness, composition, and bond strength.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance and Retention of Partial Implant Restorations Cemented with Fuji PlusMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effect of MDP agents on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to saliva-contaminated dentin substrates.European journal of oral sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of acidic surface treatment on shear bond strength of composite cement to zirconia: a comparative study.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- Surface Pretreatment Protocols For Indirect/Semi-Direct Dental Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Expert Consensus.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- 10-MDP in dentin bonding: a novel role in pulp protection via modulation of dental pulp stem cell behavior.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Composite Repair on Zirconia: Influence of Different Sandblasting Pretreatments and Various Universal Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of combining different 10-MDP-containing primers and cement systems on shear bond strength between resin cement and zirconia.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
- Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Different surface treatments and adhesive monomers for zirconia-resin bonds: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Japanese dental science review · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: "What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?" Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.