Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34067477›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

EMG and Joint Angle-Based Machine Learning to Predict Future Joint Angles at the Knee.

Jordan Coker, Howard Chen, Mark C Schall, Sean Gallagher, Michael Zabala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan CokerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Howard ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Mark C SchallDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-0292
Sean GallagherDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Michael ZabalaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Auburn University · US

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to measure electrical activity of the skeletal muscles. As exoskeleton technology advances, these signals may be used to predict human intent for control purposes. This study used an artificial neural network trained and tested with knee flexion angles and knee muscle EMG signals to predict knee flexion angles during gait at 50, 100, 150, and 200 ms into the future. The hypothesis of this study was that the algorithm's prediction accuracy would only be affected by time into the future, not subject, gender or side, and that as time into the future increased, the prediction accuracy would decrease. A secondary hypothesis was that as the number of algorithm training trials increased, the prediction accuracy of the artificial neural network (ANN) would increase. The results of this study indicate that only time into the future affected the accuracy of knee flexion angle prediction (

Indexed as

KneeKnee JointElectromyographyHumansMachine LearningMuscle, SkeletalEMGjoint anglemachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID34067477
PMCPMC8197024
OpenAlexW3165653836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.