Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34067262›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Perfume and Flavor Engineering: A Chemical Engineering Perspective.

Alírio E Rodrigues, Idelfonso Nogueira, Rui P V Faria

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alírio E RodriguesLaboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering, LSRE-LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0715-4761
Idelfonso NogueiraLaboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering, LSRE-LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-6449
Rui P V FariaLaboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering, LSRE-LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-0613
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50020/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, scientific methodologies for the prediction of the design, performance and classification of fragrance mixtures have been developed at the Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering. This review intends to give an overview of such developments. It all started with the question: what do we smell? The Perfumery Ternary Diagram enables us to determine the dominant odor for each perfume composition. Evaporation and 1D diffusion model is analyzed based on vapor-liquid equilibrium and Fick's law for diffusion giving access to perfume performance parameters. The effect of matrix and skin is addressed and the trail of perfumes analyzed. Classification of perfumes with the perfumery radar is discussed. The methodology is extended to flavor and taste engineering. Finally, future research directions are suggested.

Indexed as

AlkenesChemical EngineeringDiffusionFlavoring AgentsGlycerolHumansOdorantsPerfumePsychophysicsSkinSkin CreamSmellThermodynamicsAlkenesFlavoring AgentsGlycerolPerfumepropyleneclassification of perfumeseffect of matrixevaporation and diffusion of perfumesflavor engineeringflavors and fragrancesperfume engineeringperfume performanceperfumery radarperfumery ternary diagramtrail of perfumes

Identifiers

PMID34067262
PMCPMC8196857
OpenAlexW3165135176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.