ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Long-Term Efficacy, Visual Performance and Patient Reported Outcomes with a Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Six-Year Follow-up.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates of Three FineVision Trifocal Intraocular Lens Platform Across Different Platforms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Registry Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of the First Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Comparison of visual quality after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses with different diopter values in the two eyes: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction with Extended Monovision-An Innovative Strategy to Achieve Spectacle Independence in Refractive Lens Exchange.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual performance, light distortion and patient reported outcomes with a new bi-aspheric non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Screening of positive dysphotopsia before multifocal intraocular lens implantation.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Review
- Three Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaires in Japanese Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery with Trifocal IOL Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Agreement between Two Devices for Measuring Pupil Diameter in Patients Implanted with Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Visual and patient-reported outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in highly myopic eyes: a prospective multicenter study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of SMILE Combined with Micro-Monovision in Presbyopic Patients: A Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Visual Performance, Satisfaction, and Spectacle Independence after Implantation of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: To evaluate the efficacy at 6 years postoperative after the implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) AT Lisa Tri 839MP. The secondary objective was to evaluate the contrast sensitivity defocus curve (CSDC), light distortion analysis (LDA), and patient reported outcomes (PROs). (2) Methods: Sixty-two subjects participated in phone call interviews to collect data regarding a visual function questionnaire (VF-14), a patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire (PRSIQ), and questions related to satisfaction and decision to be implanted with the same IOL. Thirty-seven of these subjects were consecutively invited to a study visit for measurement of their visual acuity (VA), CSDC, and LDA. (3) Results: The mean monocular distance corrected VA was -0.05, 0.08, and 0.05 logMAR at far and distances of 67 cm and 40 cm, respectively. These VAs were significantly superior to those reported in previous literature (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.