Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34067133›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluation of Physical Interaction during Walker-Assisted Gait with the AGoRA Walker: Strategies Based on Virtual Mechanical Stiffness.

Sergio D Sierra M, Marcela Múnera, Thomas Provot, Maxime Bourgain, Carlos A Cifuentes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functions and Sensors of Smart Walkers From 2015 to 2024: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio D Sierra MDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5714-1478
Marcela MúneraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6595-5383
Thomas ProvotEPF-Graduate School of Engineering, F-92330 Sceaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4610-9231
Maxime BourgainEPF-Graduate School of Engineering, F-92330 Sceaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-4858
Carlos A CifuentesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-865X
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito · COArts et Métiers · FR

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Colombia 801-2017Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Colombia 845-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart walkers are commonly used as potential gait assistance devices, to provide physical and cognitive assistance within rehabilitation and clinical scenarios. To understand such rehabilitation processes, several biomechanical studies have been conducted to assess human gait with passive and active walkers. Several sessions were conducted with 11 healthy volunteers to assess three interaction strategies based on passive, low and high mechanical stiffness values on the AGoRA Smart Walker. The trials were carried out in a motion analysis laboratory. Kinematic data were also collected from the smart walker sensory interface. The interaction force between users and the device was recorded. The force required under passive and low stiffness modes was 56.66% and 67.48% smaller than the high stiffness mode, respectively. An increase of 17.03% for the hip range of motion, as well as the highest trunk's inclination, were obtained under the resistive mode, suggesting a compensating motion to exert a higher impulse force on the device. Kinematic and physical interaction data suggested that the high stiffness mode significantly affected the users' gait pattern. Results suggested that users compensated their kinematics, tilting their trunk and lower limbs to exert higher impulse forces on the device.

Indexed as

GaitWalkersBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLower ExtremityRange of Motion, ArticularWalkingassistive roboticsgait analysishaptic interfacephysical interactionsmart walkervirtual stiffness

Identifiers

PMID34067133
PMCPMC8125083
OpenAlexW3159053568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.