Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066863›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2021

Sex Differences in Circadian Clock Genes and Myocardial Infarction Susceptibility.

Ivana Škrlec, Jasminka Talapko, Martina Juzbašić, Robert Steiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Gene- and cell-based therapy in cardiovascular diseases.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Myocardial Infarction Susceptibility and theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genetic Variations within the BovineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivana ŠkrlecFaculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-930X
Jasminka TalapkoFaculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-0807
Martina JuzbašićFaculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Robert SteinerFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Josipa Huttlera 4, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia.
University of Osijek · HR

Funding

Croatian Ministry of Science and Education, the Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Croatia IP8-FDMZ-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing body of evidence shows a significant difference in the circadian rhythm of cardiovascular disease based on biological sex. The incidence of cardiovascular disease varies between women and men. Additionally, biological sex is vital for the timely application of therapy-chronotherapy, which benefits both sexes. This study aimed to examine the potential difference of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the circadian rhythm genes

Indexed as

biological sexcircadian rhythmclock genesmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID34066863
PMCPMC8151899
OpenAlexW3160309316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.