ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions of
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in residual lesion detection after treatment of metastatic prostate cancer based on dual-tracer PET/CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood algorithms for PET/CT image reconstruction in various malignancies usingFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- β1600 Q.Clear Digital Reconstruction of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Rapid Whole-Body FDG PET/MRI in Oncology Patients: Utility of Combining Bayesian Penalised Likelihood PET Reconstruction and Abbreviated MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Phantom and clinical evaluation of the effect of a new Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (HYPER Iterative) onEJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Editorial on Special Issue "Quantitative PET and SPECT".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Correction: Rijnsdorp et al. Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional imaging with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.