Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066817›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Liquid Biopsy for Small Cell Lung Cancer either De Novo or Transformed: Systematic Review of Different Applications and Meta-Analysis.

Elio Gregory Pizzutilo, Martino Pedrani, Alessio Amatu, Lorenzo Ruggieri, Calogero Lauricella, Silvio Marco Veronese, Diego Signorelli, Giulio Cerea, Laura Giannetta, Salvatore Siena and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine tumours.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Actionable Driver Events in Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elio Gregory PizzutiloNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1440-1820
Martino PedraniNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-8226
Alessio AmatuNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5396-3378
Lorenzo RuggieriNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Calogero LauricellaNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-3359
Silvio Marco VeroneseNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5280-3740
Diego SignorelliNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Giulio CereaNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Laura GiannettaNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Salvatore SienaNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Andrea Sartore-BianchiNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-0409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential added value of liquid biopsy (LB) is not well determined in the case of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), an aggressive tumor that can occur either de novo or from the histologic transformation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsA systematic review of studies adopting LB in patients with SCLC have been performed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor cells (CTCs).

resultsAfter a screening of 728 records, 62 studies (32 evaluating CTCs, 27 ctDNA, and 3 both) met predetermined eligibility criteria. Only four studies evaluated LB in the diagnostic setting for SCLC, while its prognostic significance was evaluated in 38 studies and prominently supported by both ctDNA and CTCs. A meta-analysis of 11 studies as for CTCs enumeration showed an HR for overall survival of 2.63 (1.71-4.05), with a potential publication bias. The feasibility of tumor genomic profiling and the predictive role of LB in terms of response/resistance to chemotherapy was assessed in 11 and 24 studies, respectively, with greater consistency for those regarding ctDNA. Intriguingly, several case reports suggest that LB can indirectly capture the transition to SCLC in NSCLC treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

conclusionsWhile dedicated trials are needed, LB holds potential clinical roles in both de novo and transformed SCLC. CtDNA analysis appears the most valuable and practicable tool for both disease monitoring and genomic profiling.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNACTCsctDNAhistologic transformationliquid biopsysmall cell lung cancertransformed SCLC

Identifiers

PMID34066817
PMCPMC8125928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.