Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066784›Full record

Trial reportCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Activity and Safety of NAB-FOLFIRI and NAB-FOLFOX as First-Line Treatment for metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (NabucCO Study).

Elisa Giommoni, Evaristo Maiello, Vanja Vaccaro, Ermanno Rondini, Caterina Vivaldi, Giampaolo Tortora, Laura Toppo, Guido Giordano, Tiziana Pia Latiano, Cinzia Lamperini and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa GiommoniMedical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1715-8440
Evaristo MaielloMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Vanja VaccaroMedical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, 00144 Roma, Italy.
Ermanno RondiniOncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Caterina VivaldiMedical Oncology Unit 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giampaolo TortoraMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Laura ToppoMedical Oncology Unit, ASST Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
Guido GiordanoOncology Unit, Ospedale "Sacro Cuore di Gesù" Fatebenefratelli, 82100 Benevento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-1075
Tiziana Pia LatianoMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Cinzia LamperiniMedical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Serena PillozziMedical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-8718
Luca BoniClinical Trial Coordinating Center, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-4047
Lorenzo AntonuzzoMedical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Francesco Di CostanzoMedical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITOspedale Santa Maria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelevant improvement in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) was provided by FOLFIRINOX and by gemcitabine (gem) plus nab-paclitaxel (Nab-p) regimens. Regardless of the first-line treatment survival benefit, most patients survive less than 1 year.

aimThe objectives of this multicenter phase I/II study were to evaluate as first-line chemotherapy (CT) two modified regimens of FOLFIRINOX, replacing either oxaliplatin (Oxa) or irinotecan with Nab-p, in patients with mPC.

methodsThe primary objectives of phase 1 were the definition of the dose limit binations, while for phase II they were the characterization of safety and activity of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX in mPC.

resultsSixty-three patients received Nab-FOLFIRI or Nab-FOLFOX in phase I. We defined MTD at 120 mg/m

conclusionNab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX might be hopeful first-line CT options for mPC patients, with promising activity and a good safety profile.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsPancreatic NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineHumansProgression-Free SurvivalDeoxycytidinedose findingFOLFIRINOXmetastatic pancreatic cancernab-paclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID34066784
PMCPMC8161763
OpenAlexW3162603367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.