Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066604›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

3D Printed Models-A Useful Tool in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Emilia Adriana Marciuc, Bogdan Ionut Dobrovat, Roxana Mihaela Popescu, Nicolaie Dobrin, Alexandru Chiriac, Daniel Marciuc, Lucian Eva, Danisia Haba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endovascular treatment simulations using a novelInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia Adriana MarciucDepartment of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Bogdan Ionut DobrovatDepartment of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-2630
Roxana Mihaela PopescuDepartment of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Nicolaie DobrinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. N. Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru ChiriacDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. N. Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Daniel MarciucDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Lucian EvaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. N. Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Danisia HabaDepartment of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many developments were made in the area of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, but this procedure also requires a good assessment of vascular anatomy prior to intervention. Seventy-six cases with brain aneurysms were selected and 1:1 scale 3D printed models were created. We asked three interventional neurosurgeons with different degrees of experience (ten years, four years, and a fourth-year resident) to review the cases using CTA (computed tomography angiogram) with MPR (multiplanar reconstructions) and VRT (volume rendering technique) and make a decision: coil embolization or stent-assisted coil embolization. After we provided them with the 3D printed models, they were asked to review their treatment plan. Statistical analysis was performed and the endovascular approach changed in 11.84% of cases for ten-year experienced neurosurgeons, 13.15% for four years experienced neurosurgeon, and 21.05% for residents. The interobserver agreement was very good between the ten years experienced interventionist and four years experienced interventionist when they analyzed the data set that included the 3D printed model. The agreement was higher between all physicians after they examined the printed model. 3D patient-specific printed models may be useful in choosing between two different endovascular techniques and also help the residents to better understand the vascular anatomy and the overall procedure.

Indexed as

3D printingcoil embolizationendovascular approachintracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID34066604
PMCPMC8148564
OpenAlexW3157735590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.