Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066481›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Clinical Implication of Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Metastasectomy.

Soohyeon Lee, Young-Soo Park, Won-Jin Chang, Jung Yoon Choi, Ahreum Lim, Boyeon Kim, Saet-Byeol Lee, Jong-Won Lee, Seon-Hahn Kim, Jin Kim and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soohyeon LeeDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9665-062X
Young-Soo ParkKorea University Cancer Research Institute, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Won-Jin ChangDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Jung Yoon ChoiDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Ahreum LimDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Boyeon KimKorea University Cancer Research Institute, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Saet-Byeol LeeKorea University Cancer Research Institute, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Jong-Won LeeKorea University Cancer Research Institute, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-3634
Seon-Hahn KimDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Jin KimDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6479-9673
Jung-Myun KwakDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Kyung-Chul YoonDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Sung-Ho LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Yeul Hong KimDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-2333
Korea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2017R1A-2B3004624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe application of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been studied for predicting recurrent disease after surgery and treatment response during systemic treatment. Metastasectomy can be curative for well-selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study investigated the ctDNA level before and after metastasectomy in patients with mCRC to explore its potential as a predictive biomarker.

methodsWe collected data on 98 metastasectomies for mCRC performed from March 2017 to February 2020. Somatic mutations in the primary and metastatic tumors were identified and tumor-informed ctDNAs were selected by ultra-deep targeted sequencing. Plasma samples were mandatorily collected before and 3-4 weeks after metastasectomy and serially, if patients agreed.

resultsData on 67 of 98 metastasectomies (58 patients) meeting the criteria were collected. ctDNA was detected in 9 (29%) of 31 cases treated with upfront metastasectomy and in 7 (19.4%) of 36 cases treated with metastasectomy after upfront chemotherapy. The detection rate of ctDNA was higher in liver metastasis (

conclusionThe biological factors affecting the ctDNA shedding from the tumor should be considered when applying ctDNA assays in a clinical setting. After metastasectomy for oligometastatic lesions in good responders of chemotherapy, most ctDNA was cleared or existed below the detection level. To assist clinical decision making after metastasectomy for mCRC using ctDNA, further studies for improving specific outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAliquid biopsymetastasectomymetastatic colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34066481
PMCPMC8125778
OpenAlexW3158452711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.