Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066460›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Cancer Screening Interventions in Indigenous Populations: A Rapid Review.

Janell Bryant, Kara Patterson, Marcus Vaska, Bonnie Chiang, Angeline Letendre, Lea Bill, Huiming Yang, Karen Kopciuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Indigenous Cancer Survivors in Peer Education and Community Knowledge Exchange: A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janell BryantScreening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, 2210-2 Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Kara PattersonScreening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, 2210-2 Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Marcus VaskaKnowledge Resource Service, Alberta Health Services, 1331-29 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-3213
Bonnie ChiangScreening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, 2210-2 Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Angeline LetendreAlberta Cancer Prevention Legacy Fund, Population, Public and Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, 102 Anderson Hall, 10959 102 ST NW, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada.
Lea BillAlberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, P.O. Box 1459, Siksika, AB T0J 3W0, Canada.
Huiming YangScreening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, 2210-2 Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Karen KopciukDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7499-1861

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer screening is an important component of a cancer control strategy. Indigenous people in Canada have higher incidence rates for many types of cancer, including those that can be detected early or prevented through organized screening programs. Increased participation and retention in cancer screening is critical to improved population health outcomes amongst Indigenous people. This rapid review evaluates cancer screening interventions published in the last six years. Included studies demonstrated increased participation in breast, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening programs in Indigenous populations or showed promise of increased participation based on the factors that influence people's screening practices, such as knowledge, attitude, or intent to screen. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guided the search strategy. The review identified 85 articles with 12 meeting the specified criteria: seven studies reported an increase in cancer screening participation and five studies reported improved knowledge, attitude, or intent to screen. The use of multiple culturally appropriate strategies in co-designed studies were the most effective. This review will be used to inform First Nations (FN) populations and Screening Programs in Alberta of potential strategies to address disparities identified through a recent data analysis comparing cancer screening and outcomes between FN and non-FN people.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlbertaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansIndigenous Peoplesattitudescancer screeningcommunity-based trialIndigenous peopleintentionsinterventionsknowledgePlan-Do-Study-Act cycles trialrandomized control trial

Identifiers

PMID34066460
PMCPMC8161813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.