Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066281›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2021

Stability and Change in Diffusion Model Parameters over Two Years.

Mischa von Krause, Stefan T Radev, Andreas Voss, Martin Quintus, Boris Egloff, Cornelia Wrzus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mischa von KrauseDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-1454
Stefan T RadevDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas VossDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin QuintusDepartment of Psychology, Mainz University, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Boris EgloffDepartment of Psychology, Mainz University, 55122 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-9912
Cornelia WrzusDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-959X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK 2277Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WR 160/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, mathematical models of decision making, such as the diffusion model, have been endorsed in individual differences research. These models can disentangle different components of the decision process, like processing speed, speed-accuracy trade-offs, and duration of non-decisional processes. The diffusion model estimates individual parameters of cognitive process components, thus allowing the study of individual differences. These parameters are often assumed to show trait-like properties, that is, within-person stability across tasks and time. However, the assumption of temporal stability has so far been insufficiently investigated. With this work, we explore stability and change in diffusion model parameters by following over 270 participants across a time period of two years. We analysed four different aspects of stability and change: rank-order stability, mean-level change, individual differences in change, and profile stability. Diffusion model parameters showed strong rank-order stability and mean-level changes in processing speed and speed-accuracy trade-offs that could be attributed to practice effects. At the same time, people differed little in these patterns across time. In addition, profiles of individual diffusion model parameters proved to be stable over time. We discuss implications of these findings for the use of the diffusion model in individual differences research.

Indexed as

cognitive modellingdiffusion modelindividual differenceslongitudinal studystability

Identifiers

PMID34066281
PMCPMC8162541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.