Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066265›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Human Activity Recognition for People with Knee Osteoarthritis-A Proof-of-Concept.

Jay-Shian Tan, Behrouz Khabbaz Beheshti, Tara Binnie, Paul Davey, J P Caneiro, Peter Kent, Anne Smith, Peter O'Sullivan, Amity Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay-Shian TanSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-3128
Behrouz Khabbaz BeheshtiCurtin Institute for Computation, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1826-6184
Tara BinnieSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Paul DaveySchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2119-8066
J P CaneiroSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Peter KentSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2429-9233
Anne SmithSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Peter O'SullivanSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Amity CampbellSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Curtin University · AU

Funding

Australian Government - Research Training Program NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians lack objective means for monitoring if their knee osteoarthritis patients are improving outside of the clinic (e.g., at home). Previous human activity recognition (HAR) models using wearable sensor data have only used data from healthy people and such models are typically imprecise for people who have medical conditions affecting movement. HAR models designed for people with knee osteoarthritis have classified rehabilitation exercises but not the clinically relevant activities of transitioning from a chair, negotiating stairs and walking, which are commonly monitored for improvement during therapy for this condition. Therefore, it is unknown if a HAR model trained on data from people who have knee osteoarthritis can be accurate in classifying these three clinically relevant activities. Therefore, we collected inertial measurement unit (IMU) data from 18 participants with knee osteoarthritis and trained convolutional neural network models to identify chair, stairs and walking activities, and phases. The model accuracy was 85% at the first level of classification (activity), 89-97% at the second (direction of movement) and 60-67% at the third level (phase). This study is the first proof-of-concept that an accurate HAR system can be developed using IMU data from people with knee osteoarthritis to classify activities and phases of activities.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeWearable Electronic DevicesHuman ActivitiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWalkinghuman activity recognitioninertial measurement unitsknee osteoarthritismachine learningphysical activity monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34066265
PMCPMC8152007
OpenAlexW3162442456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.