Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066238›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Reliability and Concurrent and Construct Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Pregnant Women at High Risk to Develop Fetal Growth Restriction.

Charlotte Juton, Sara Castro-Barquero, Rosa Casas, Tania Freitas, Ana Maria Ruiz-León, Francesca Crovetto, Mónica Domenech, Fátima Crispi, Eduard Vieta, Eduard Gratacós and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Modulation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte JutonInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Endocrinology Department, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950 Barcelona, Spain.
Sara Castro-BarqueroDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6876-5443
Rosa CasasDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0211-9166
Tania FreitasDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Maria Ruiz-LeónDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8180-5991
Francesca CrovettoBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Centre, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-7411
Mónica DomenechDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Fátima CrispiBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Centre, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-5240
Eduard VietaDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic, Neuroscience Institute, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-0053
Eduard GratacósBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Centre, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Ramon EstruchDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-4445
Helmut SchroderInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Endocrinology Department, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy of dietary assessment instruments such as food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is crucial in the evaluation of diet-disease relationships. Test-retest reliability and concurrent and construct validity of a FFQ were evaluated in 150 pregnant women at high risk to develop fetal growth restriction randomly selected from those included in the improving mothers for better prenatal care trial Barcelona (IMPACT BCN). The FFQ and dietary records were performed at baseline and 34-36 weeks of gestation. Test-retest reliability of the FFQ for 12 food groups and 17 nutrients was moderate (ICC = 0.55) and good (ICC = 0.60), respectively. Concurrent validity between food, nutrients and a composite Mediterranean diet score (MedDiet score) and food records was fair for foods and nutrients (ρ average = 0.38 and 0.32, respectively) and moderate (r = 0.46) for the MedDiet score. Validation with biological markers ranged from poor (r = 0.07) for olives to moderate (r = 0.41) for nuts. A fair concordance between methods were found for nutrients (weighted κ = 0.22) and foods (weighted κ = 0.27). The FFQ-derived MedDiet score correlated in anticipated directions with intakes of nutrients and foods derived by food records. The FFQ showed a moderate test-retest reliability and reasonable validity to rank women according to their food and nutrient consumption and adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

Indexed as

EatingAdultDiet, MediterraneanDiet SurveysFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansNutrition SurveysPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesfetal growth restrictionfood frequency questionnaireMediterranean dietpregnancyreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID34066238
PMCPMC8150790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.