Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066211›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Effectiveness of an Annual Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge on Changing Step Counts: Findings from Four Years of Delivery.

Ailsa Niven, Gemma Cathrine Ryde, Guy Wilkinson, Carl Greenwood, Trish Gorely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Walking Engagement in Mexican Americans Who Participated in a Community-Wide Step Challenge in El Paso, TX.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ailsa NivenPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, Institute of Sport, PE and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK.
Gemma Cathrine RydeDivision of Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9117-0803
Guy WilkinsonDivision of Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Carl GreenwoodPaths for All, Kintail House, Forthside Way, Stirling FK8 1QZ, UK.
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV3 5SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-0679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paths for All's 8-week online Workplace Step Count Challenge (SCC) is a flagship program of Scotland's National Walking Strategy. The aim of this study was to examine changes in step counts throughout the duration of the SCC, across four years of delivery. Participants were those who registered for the 2015-2018 SCCs, and reported demographic data at registration. Participants self-reported their device-measured step count for each day of the SCC. Following data screening, mean daily steps for each week were calculated. Linear mixed models (R nlme procedure), controlling for the within subject nature of the step count measure, were used to explore changes in steps over time. Gender and age group (<45 years; ≥45 years) were entered into a subsequent model. Separate models were created for each year of the SCC and for all years combined. Participants (

Indexed as

WalkingWorkplaceExerciseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSelf ReportTimeoccupational healthphysical activitywalkingworkplace

Identifiers

PMID34066211
PMCPMC8150609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.