Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066118›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Screening and Comparison of Lignin Degradation Microbial Consortia from Wooden Antiques.

Wen Zhang, Xueyan Ren, Qiong Lei, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endophytes in Lignin Valorization: A Novel Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wen ZhangSchool of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2834-3035
Xueyan RenSchool of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, China.
Qiong LeiJingzhou Conservation Center of Hubei Province, Wood Lacquer Protection Research Department, Jingzhou 434020, China.
Lei WangSchool of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-687X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.21476190; 21606005Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LQ20B060004Zhejiang Shuren University Basic Scientific Research Special Funds 2021XZ016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lignin, which is a component of wood, is difficult to degrade in nature. However, serious decay caused by microbial consortia can happen to wooden antiques during the preservation process. This study successfully screened four microbial consortia with lignin degradation capabilities (J-1, J-6, J-8 and J-15) from decayed wooden antiques. Their compositions were identified by genomic sequencing, while the degradation products were analyzed by GC-MS. The lignin degradation efficiency of J-6 reached 54% after 48 h with an initial lignin concentration of 0.5 g/L at pH 4 and rotation speed of 200 rpm. The fungal consortium of J-6 contained Saccharomycetales (98.92%) and Ascomycota (0.56%), which accounted for 31% of the total biomass. The main bacteria in J-6 were

Indexed as

AscomycotaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassBradyrhizobiaceaeCupriavidusDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryLaccaseLigninMicrobial ConsortiaPeroxidasesRhizobiaceaeSaccharomycetalesSequence Analysis, DNAWoodDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalLaccaseLigninlignin peroxidasemanganese peroxidasePeroxidasesbiomasslignin degradationmicrobial consortiumsynergetic degradation

Identifiers

PMID34066118
PMCPMC8151908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.