Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066079›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

So Much for Glucosinolates: A Generalist Does Survive and Develop on Brassicas, but at What Cost?

Verena Jeschke, Jacinta M Zalucki, Bettina Raguschke, Jonathan Gershenzon, David G Heckel, Myron P Zalucki, Daniel G Vassão

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The lepidopteran analyst: how caterpillars, moths and butterflies encode taste identity and valence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cyclic Isothiocyanate Goitrin ImpairsPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plant-Insect Interactions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Verena JeschkeMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Jacinta M ZaluckiCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia.
Bettina RaguschkeMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Jonathan GershenzonMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
David G HeckelMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-2150
Myron P ZaluckiThe School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-7577
Daniel G VassãoMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8455-9298
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEGriffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP1095433Max-Planck-GesellschaftQueensland Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While plants produce complex cocktails of chemical defences with different targets and efficacies, the biochemical effects of phytotoxin ingestion are often poorly understood. Here, we examine the physiological and metabolic effects of the ingestion of glucosinolates (GSLs), the frontline chemical defenses of brassicas (crucifers), on the generalist herbivore

Indexed as

Brassicaceaegeneralist herbivoreglucosinolatesHelicoverpa armigeraisothiocyanatesplant chemical defenses

Identifiers

PMID34066079
PMCPMC8150600
OpenAlexW3162896529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.