Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066021›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Virologic Response to Very Early HIV Treatment in Neonates.

Stephanie Shiau, Renate Strehlau, Yanhan Shen, Yun He, Faeezah Patel, Megan Burke, Elaine J Abrams, Caroline T Tiemessen, Shuang Wang, Louise Kuhn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Demographics of Youth With Newly Diagnosed Acute/Recent HIV Infection in Adolescent Trials Network 147: Early Treatment of Acute HIV Infection.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie ShiauDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2944-3406
Renate StrehlauEmpilweni Services and Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2112, South Africa.
Yanhan ShenGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Yun HeDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Faeezah PatelEmpilweni Services and Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2112, South Africa.
Megan BurkeEmpilweni Services and Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2112, South Africa.
Elaine J AbramsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Caroline T TiemessenCentre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Services, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Shuang WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Louise KuhnGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USWestern Cape Department of Health · ZAICAP Global HealthNational Health Laboratory Service · ZARutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Early neonatal treatment and immune quiescenceU01HD080441 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUHN, LOUISE · 2014 to 2018
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD080441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors that influence viral response when antiretroviral therapy (ART) is initiated in neonates are not well characterized. We assessed if there is consistency in predictive factors when operationalizing viral response using different methods. Data were collected from a clinical study in South Africa that started ART in neonates within 14 days of birth (2013-2018). Among 61 infants followed for ≥48 weeks after ART initiation, viral response through 72 weeks was defined by three methods: (1) clinical endpoints (virologic success, rebound, and failure); (2) time to viral suppression, i.e., any viral load (VL: copies/mL) <400, <50, or target not detected (TND) using time-to-event methods; and (3) latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to empirically estimate discrete groups with shared patterns of VL trajectories over time. We investigated the following factors: age at ART initiation, sex, birthweight, preterm birth, mode of delivery, breastfeeding, pre-treatment VL and CD4, maternal ART during pregnancy, and maternal VL and CD4 count. ART was initiated 0-48 h of birth among 57.4% of the infants, 48 h-7 days in 29.5% and 8-14 days in 13.1%. By Method 1, infants were categorized into 'success' (54.1%), 'rebound' (21.3%), and 'failure' (24.6%) for viral response. For Method 2, median time to achieving a VL <400, <50, or TND was 58, 123, and 331 days, respectively. For Method 3, infants were categorized into three trajectories: 'rapid decline' (29.5%), 'slow decline' (47.5%), and 'persistently high' (23.0%). All methods found that higher pre-treatment VL, particularly >100,000, was associated with less favorable viral outcomes. No exposure to maternal ART was associated with a better viral response, while a higher maternal VL was associated with less favorable viral response and higher maternal CD4 was associated with better viral response across all three methods. The LCGA method found that infants who initiated ART 8-14 days had less favorable viral response than those who initiated ART earlier. The other two methods trended in a similar direction. Across three methods to operationalize viral response in the context of early infant treatment, findings of factors associated with viral response were largely consistent, including infant pre-treatment VL, maternal VL, and maternal CD4 count.

Indexed as

ARVinfantsneonatespediatricsviral responseviral suppression

Identifiers

PMID34066021
PMCPMC8151270
OpenAlexW3160819828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.