Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34066011›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Insects as Feed for Farmed Poultry: Are Italian Consumers Ready to Embrace This Innovation?

Davide Menozzi, Giovanni Sogari, Cristina Mora, Marta Gariglio, Laura Gasco, Achille Schiavone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The use of edible insects in human food.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects of Dietary Resveratrol and Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Exploring the Future of Edible Insects in Europe.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Italian Consumers' Readiness to Adopt Eggs from Insect-Fed Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davide MenozziDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 45/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5241-1587
Giovanni SogariDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 45/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-571X
Cristina MoraDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 45/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.
Marta GariglioDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Laura GascoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-7936
Achille SchiavoneDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-6999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of insects as a protein source in feed production is not only related to technical, economical, and normative restrictions but is also affected by consumer acceptance. In this study, we evaluated consumers' attitudes, intention to purchase and eat, and willingness to pay for meat obtained from a farmed duck fed with insect-based meal or a live insect diet. We conducted a survey among a sample of 565 consumers to test the effects of information about the benefits of using insects as feed on consumers' attitudes towards animal-based products fed with insects. Providing information on the sustainability and nutritional benefits of using insects as feed increased both attitude towards and intention to purchase and eat meat products made from animals fed with insects. In the treatment group, we found a significant reduction from 21.9 to 14.0% in those who wanted to be compensated for buying a duck fed with an insect-based meal and an increase in those willing to pay the same price-from 64.9 to 72.7%. The information treatment significantly increased the intention to eat such products, suggesting that increasing consumers' knowledge might help in reducing the fears and misconceptions around the topic of using insects as a feed source.

Indexed as

animal welfareattitudeconsumer behaviorduck meatinformationinsect-based feedinsect mealintentionpreferencessustainabilitywillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID34066011
PMCPMC8151576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.