ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy versus robotic multi-port hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical application and early experience of da Vinci Xi robotic single-site laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in mainland China: early experience from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 221 cases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- The feasibility and surgical outcomes of robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic single port hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparative analysis of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in adnexectomy: A systematic review and metaanalysis of surgical outcome.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal mass in pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted total hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Variations in sexual function after laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy in women with benign gynecologic diseases.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Single-port Robotic Surgery Using the Da Vinci SP Surgical System and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Indications.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) refers to a spectrum of surgical techniques that allow the performance of laparoscopic surgery through consolidation of all ports into one surgical incision. LESS has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to multiport laparoscopy and in the last year in gynecology; hence, this approach has been largely applied for selective indications to perform total hysterectomy. We performed a literature review on single site hysterectomy and described indications and technique, highlighting practical problems, pointers, limitations and recent technical development as robotic assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.