Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065950›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Newborn Screening and Treatment of Phenylketonuria: Projected Health Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness.

Huey-Fen Chen, Angela M Rose, Susan Waisbren, Ayesha Ahmad, Lisa A Prosser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing Value in Child Health.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huey-Fen ChenDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Angela M RoseSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Susan WaisbrenDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ayesha AhmadDivision of Pediatric Genetics, Metabolism and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lisa A ProsserDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Health and Economic Outcomes for Newborn ScreeningR01HS020644 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PROSSER, LISA A. · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS020644University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (IHPI) Summer Student FellowshipUniversity of Michigan Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening and treatment for phenylketonuria (PKU) in the context of new data on adherence to recommended diet treatment and a newly available drug treatment (sapropterin dihydrochloride). A computer simulation model was developed to project outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of newborns with PKU. Four strategies were compared: (1) clinical identification (CI) with diet treatment; (2) newborn screening (NBS) with diet treatment; (3) CI with diet and medication (sapropterin dihydrochloride); and (4) NBS with diet and medication. Data sources included published literature, primary data, and expert opinion. From a societal perspective, newborn screening with diet treatment had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $6400/QALY compared to clinical identification with diet treatment. Adding medication to NBS with diet treatment resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of more than $16,000,000/QALY. Uncertainty analyses did not substantially alter the cost-effectiveness results. Newborn screening for PKU with diet treatment yields a cost-effectiveness ratio lower than many other recommended childhood prevention programs even if adherence is lower than previously assumed. Adding medication yields cost-effectiveness results unlikely to be considered favorable. Future research should consider conditions under which sapropterin dihydrochloride would be more economically attractive.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessnewborn screeningphenylketonuriasapropterin dihydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID34065950
PMCPMC8151371
OpenAlexW3161731347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.