ArticlePharmaceutics2021
A Systematic, Knowledge Space-Based Proposal on Quality by Design-Driven Polymeric Micelle Development.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biocatalytic and biogenic pathways for sustainable nanoparticle synthesis: mechanisms, monitoring, and circular bioeconomy integration.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Application of quality by design in optimization of nanoformulations: Principle, perspectives and practices.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- Risperidone-Loaded Nasal Thermosensitive Polymeric Micelles: Quality by Design-Based Formulation Study.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Risk-Assessment-Based Optimization Favours the Development of Albumin Nanoparticles with Proper Characteristics Prior to Drug Loading.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Quality by Design-Driven Zeta Potential Optimisation Study of Liposomes with Charge Imparting Membrane Additives.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Characterizing the Drug-Release Enhancement Effect of Surfactants on Megestrol-Acetate-Loaded Granules.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cellulosic Polymers for Enhancing Drug Bioavailability in Ocular Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- An Updated Risk Assessment as Part of the QbD-Based Liposome Design and Development.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticle research and development for pharmaceuticals is a challenging task in the era of personalized medicine. Specialized and increased patient expectations and requirements for proper therapy adherence, as well as sustainable environment safety and toxicology topics raise the necessity of well designed, advanced and smart drug delivery systems on the market. These stakeholder expectations and social responsibility of pharma sector open the space and call new methods on the floor for new strategic development tools, like Quality by Design (QbD) thinking. The extended model, namely the R&D QbD proved to be useful in case of complex and/or high risk/expectations containing or aiming developments. This is the case when we formulate polymeric micelles as promising nanotherapeutics; the risk assessment and knowledge-based quality targeted QbD approach provides a promising tool to support the development process. Based on risk assessment, many factors pose great risk in the manufacturing process and affect the quality, efficacy and safety profile. The quality-driven strategic development pathway, based on deep prior knowledge and an involving iterative risk estimation and management phases has proven to be an adequate tool, being able to handle their sensitive stability issues and make them efficient therapeutic aids in case of several diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.