Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065813›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.

Kim Edmunds, Laura Wall, Scott Brown, Andrew Searles, Anthony P Shakeshaft, Christopher M Doran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kim EdmundsCentre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-1294
Laura WallSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Scott BrownSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Andrew SearlesHealth Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.
Anthony P ShakeshaftNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2502, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-0930
Christopher M DoranCluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUCentral Queensland University · AUGriffith University · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based intervention designed to build capacity amongst 14-17-year-old high risk young people. The aim of the current study seeks to explore community value and preferences for reducing youth crime and improving community safety using BackTrack in a rural setting in Armidale, New South Wales, Australia. The study design used discrete choice experiments (DCEs), designed in accordance with the 10-item checklist outlined by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The DCE was pilot tested on 43 participants to test feasibility and comprehension. A revised version of the survey was subsequently completed by 282 people over a 12-day period between 30 May 2016 and 10 June 2016, representing a survey response rate of 35%. Ninety per cent of respondents were residents of Armidale, the local rural town where BackTrack was implemented. The DCE generated results that consistently demonstrated a preference for social programs to address youth crime and community safety in the Armidale area. Respondents chose BackTrack over Greater Police Presence 75% of the time with an annual benefit of Australian dollars (AUD) 150 per household, equivalent to a community benefit of AUD 2.04 million. This study estimates a strong community preference for BackTrack relative to more policing (a community willing to pay equivalent to AUD 2.04 million) highlighting the clear value of including community preferences when evaluating community-based programs for high-risk young people.

Indexed as

CrimePoliceAdolescentAustraliaChoice BehaviorHumansNew South WalesSurveys and Questionnairescommunityeconomicinterventionpreferenceyouth crime

Identifiers

PMID34065813
PMCPMC8150417
OpenAlexW3161874123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.