Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065516›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography Assessment of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: Validation of WHOOP.

Clint R Bellenger, Dean J Miller, Shona L Halson, Gregory D Roach, Charli Sargent

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07097168 (Evaluating Clinical Course in Coronary Artery Bypass Patients Using the WHOOP Fitness Band Heart Rate Variability Application.), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07097168 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Clinical Course in Coronary Artery Bypass Patients Using the WHOOP Fitness Band Heart Rate Variability Application.

TypeobservationalSponsorTufts Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Guidelines for rigor and reproducibility of heart rate variability within human cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clint R BellengerAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Dean J MillerThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide 5043, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-4346
Shona L HalsonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane 4014, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-3878
Gregory D RoachThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide 5043, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-1243
Charli SargentThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide 5043, Australia.
Central Queensland University · AUAustralian Catholic University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council DP160104909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) infer readiness to perform exercise in athletic populations. Technological advancements have facilitated HR and HRV quantification via photoplethysmography (PPG). This study evaluated the validity of WHOOP's PPG-derived HR and HRV against electrocardiogram-derived (ECG) measures. HR and HRV were assessed via WHOOP and ECG over 15 opportunities. WHOOP-derived pulse-to-pulse (PP) intervals were edited with WHOOP's proprietary filter, in addition to various filter strengths via Kubios HRV software. HR and HRV (Ln RMSSD) were quantified for each filter strength. Agreement was assessed via bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and contextualised using smallest worthwhile change (SWC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Regardless of filter strength, bias (≤0.39 ± 0.38%) and LOA (≤1.56%) in HR were lower than the CV (10-11%) and SWC (5-5.5%) for this parameter. For Ln RMSSD, bias (1.66 ± 1.80%) and LOA (±5.93%) were lowest for a 200 ms filter and WHOOP's proprietary filter, which approached or exceeded the CV (3-13%) and SWC (1.5-6.5%) for this parameter. Acceptable agreement was found between WHOOP- and ECG-derived HR. Bias and LOA in Ln RMSSD approached or exceeded the SWC/CV for this variable and should be interpreted against its own level of bias precision.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyWristElectrocardiographyHeart RateWrist Jointagreementautonomic nervous systemelectrocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID34065516
PMCPMC8160717
OpenAlexW3161315230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.