Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Deep Learning in Pancreatic Tissue: Identification of Anatomical Structures, Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Mark Kriegsmann, Katharina Kriegsmann, Georg Steinbuss, Christiane Zgorzelski, Anne Kraft, Matthias M Gaida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark KriegsmannInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7319-3646
Katharina KriegsmannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg SteinbussDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Christiane ZgorzelskiInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne KraftInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, JGU-Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Matthias M GaidaInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, JGU-Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC and German Research Foundation GA1818/2-3 and INST 35/1134-1 FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and precursor lesions in histological tissue slides can be challenging and elaborate, especially due to tumor heterogeneity. Thus, supportive tools for the identification of anatomical and pathological tissue structures are desired. Deep learning methods recently emerged, which classify histological structures into image categories with high accuracy. However, to date, only a limited number of classes and patients have been included in histopathological studies. In this study, scanned histopathological tissue slides from tissue microarrays of PDAC patients (

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPancreatic DuctsPancreatic Neoplasmsartificial intelligenceconvolutional neuronal networksdeep learningpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID34065423
PMCPMC8160892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.