Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065408›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Metal Contents in Fish from the Bay of Bengal and Potential Consumer Exposure-The EAF-Nansen Programme.

Amalie Moxness Reksten, Zillur Rahman, Marian Kjellevold, Esther Garrido Gamarro, Shakuntala H Thilsted, Lauren M Pincus, Inger Aakre, John Ryder, Sujeewa Ariyawansa, Anna Nordhagen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amalie Moxness RekstenSeafood, Nutrition and Environmental State, Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 2029 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-0719
Zillur RahmanQuality Control Laboratory, Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries & Livestock, Khulna 9000, Bangladesh.
Marian KjellevoldSeafood, Nutrition and Environmental State, Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 2029 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7070-5784
Esther Garrido GamarroFisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Shakuntala H ThilstedWorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, Bayan Lepas 11960, Penang, Malaysia.
Lauren M PincusWorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, Bayan Lepas 11960, Penang, Malaysia.
Inger AakreSeafood, Nutrition and Environmental State, Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 2029 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-1823
John RyderFisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Sujeewa AriyawansaNational Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency, Crow Island, Colombo 01500, Sri Lanka.
Anna NordhagenSeafood, Nutrition and Environmental State, Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 2029 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.
Anne-Katrine LundebyeSeafood, Nutrition and Environmental State, Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 2029 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid EAF-Nansen programme GCP/GLO/690/NOR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish represent an important part of the Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi diet. However, fish is also a source of contaminants that may constitute a health risk to consumers. The aim of this study was to analyse the contents of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in 24 commonly consumed marine fish species from the Bay of Bengal and to assess the potential health risk associated with their consumption. Mercury and lead contents did not exceed the maximum limits for any of the sampled species, and consumer exposure from estimated daily consumption was assessed to be minimal for adults and children. Numerous samples exceeded the maximum limit for cadmium (58%), particularly those of small size (≤25 cm). However, consumer exposure was insignificant, and health assessment showed no risk connected to consumption. These data represent an important contribution to future risk/benefit assessments related to the consumption of fish.

Indexed as

arsenicBangladeshcadmiumfishleadmercuryrisk assessmentSri Lanka

Identifiers

PMID34065408
PMCPMC8160839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.