Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064984›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Continuous In-Line Chromium Coating Thickness Measurement Methodologies: An Investigation of Current and Potential Technology.

Adam Jones, Leshan Uggalla, Kang Li, Yuanlong Fan, Ashley Willow, Christopher A Mills, Nigel Copner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optical Sensors Technology and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam JonesWireless and Optoelectronic Research and Innovation Centre, University of South Wales, Treforest CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-2279
Leshan UggallaWireless and Optoelectronic Research and Innovation Centre, University of South Wales, Treforest CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9835-9967
Kang LiWireless and Optoelectronic Research and Innovation Centre, University of South Wales, Treforest CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-4037
Yuanlong FanWireless and Optoelectronic Research and Innovation Centre, University of South Wales, Treforest CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8914-4796
Ashley WillowTata Steel, Research and Development, Swansea Technology Centre, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Christopher A MillsTata Steel, Research and Development, Swansea Technology Centre, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-4978
Nigel CopnerWireless and Optoelectronic Research and Innovation Centre, University of South Wales, Treforest CF37 1DL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coatings or films are applied to a substrate for several applications, such as waterproofing, corrosion resistance, adhesion performance, cosmetic effects, and optical coatings. When applying a coating to a substrate, it is vital to monitor the coating thickness during the coating process to achieve a product to the desired specification via real time production control. There are several different coating thickness measurement methods that can be used, either in-line or off-line, which can determine the coating thickness relative to the material of the coating and the substrate. In-line coating thickness measurement methods are often very difficult to design and implement due to the nature of the harsh environmental conditions of typical production processes and the speed at which the process is run. This paper addresses the current and novel coating thickness methodologies for application to chromium coatings on a ferro-magnetic steel substrate with their advantages and limitations regarding in-line measurement. The most common in-line coating thickness measurement method utilized within the steel packaging industry is the X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) method, but these systems can become costly when implemented for a wide packaging product and pose health and safety concerns due to its ionizing radiation. As technology advances, nanometer-scale coatings are becoming more common, and here three methods are highlighted, which have been used extensively in other industries (with several variants in their design) which can potentially measure coatings of nanometer thickness in a production line, precisely, safely, and do so in a non-contact and non-destructive manner. These methods are optical reflectometry, ellipsometry and interferometry.

Indexed as

chromiumcoating thickness measurementoptical metrologysteel substrate

Identifiers

PMID34064984
PMCPMC8151628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.