Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064930›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effects of Dog-Assisted Therapies on Cognitive Mnemonic Capabilities in People Affected by Alzheimer's Disease.

Fausto Quintavalla, Simona Cao, Diana Spinelli, Paolo Caffarra, Fiammetta M Rossi, Giuseppina Basini, Alberto Sabbioni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fausto QuintavallaDipartimento di Scienze Medico Veterinarie, Università di Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-1167
Simona CaoSocietà Cooperativa Sociale r.l. Killia, Via Svetonio 23, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Diana SpinelliSocietà Cooperativa Sociale r.l. Killia, Via Svetonio 23, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Paolo CaffarraSezione di Neuroscienze, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Fiammetta M RossiAssociazione Jiva, Via Erberto Carboni, 2/D, 43123 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-9573
Giuseppina BasiniDipartimento di Scienze Medico Veterinarie, Università di Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-7023
Alberto SabbioniDipartimento di Scienze Medico Veterinarie, Università di Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-6668
University of Parma · IT

Funding

Nestlè Purina Petcare Global Resources, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA. Nestlè Purina Petcare Global Resources, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in humans and, currently, a valid treatment is lacking. Our goal is to demonstrate the importance and benefits of the relationship with companion animals (considered as co-therapists), intended as a means of facilitating social relations and promoting evident wellbeing in AD patients. The study involved 30 randomly chosen patients with Alzheimer's disease (group T) and three dogs. The group participated in a total of 24 animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) sessions over a span of 12 weeks, using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wellness and Cognitive Ability Questionnaire (Brief Assessment Cognition or BAC), and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) as assessment tests. A second group (group C), consisting of 10 people with AD, was enrolled as control group and underwent the same assessment tests but did not benefit from the presence of the dogs. Tests were carried out at time T0 (before starting sessions), T1 (end of sessions), and T2 (two months after last session). People belonging to group T achieved an overall improvement in their perceived state of wellbeing, even on a cognitive and mnemonic plane. However, two months after the end of the sessions, the test results in people suffering from AD decreased towards the baseline (T0). The study shows how such progress can be achieved through activities based on the relationship with an animal, as long as the animal is a steady presence in the life of the patient receiving the intervention. Dogs involved in other dog-assisted therapies have been found suitable also for assisting patients with AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)animal-assisted interventions (AAIs)dogselderly patientsMini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)senile dementiaWellness and Cognitive Ability Questionnaire (Brief Assessment Cognition or BAC)

Identifiers

PMID34064930
PMCPMC8151255
OpenAlexW3163600972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.