Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064865›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Analysis of Bio-Risk Management System Implementation in Indonesian Higher Education Laboratory.

Anom Bowolaksono, Fatma Lestari, Saraswati Andani Satyawardhani, Abdul Kadir, Cynthia Febrina Maharani, Debby Paramitasari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementation of a Biorisk Management System in Armenia for ISO 35001:2019 Certification.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anom BowolaksonoCellular and Molecular Mechanisms in Biological System (CEMBIOS) Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3180-1460
Fatma LestariDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1389-4360
Saraswati Andani SatyawardhaniDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Abdul KadirDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-4082
Cynthia Febrina MaharaniOccupational and Environmental Health Department, Public Health Faculty, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Debby ParamitasariDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1782-6250
University of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing countries face various challenges in implementing bio-risk management systems in the laboratory. In addition, educational settings are considered as workplaces with biohazard risks. Every activity in a laboratory facility carries many potential hazards that can impact human health and the environment and may cause laboratory incidents, including Laboratory Acquired Infections (LAIs). In an effort to minimize the impact and occurrence of these incidents, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of a bio-risk management system in every activity that involves handling biological agents. This study was conducted in an Indonesian higher-education institution, herein coded as University Y. This is a descriptive, semi-quantitative study aimed at analysing and evaluating the implementation of the bio-risk management systems used in laboratories by analysing the achievements obtained by each laboratory. The study used primary data that were collected using a checklist which referred to ISO 35001:2019 on Laboratory Bio-risk Management. The checklist consisted of 202 items forming seven main elements. In addition, secondary data obtained from literature and document review were also used. The results show that out of 11 laboratories examined, only 2 laboratories met 50% of the requirements, which were Laboratory A and B, achieving good performance. Regarding the clauses of standards, a gap analysis identified leadership, performance evaluation, and support as elements with the lowest achievement. Therefore, corrective action should be developed by enhancing the commitment from management as well as improving documentation, policy, education and training.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesLaboratory InfectionHazardous SubstancesHumansIndonesiaRisk ManagementHazardous Substancesbio-risk managementgap analysishigher educationISO 35001:2019laboratory

Identifiers

PMID34064865
PMCPMC8151126
OpenAlexW3161298972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.