Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064641›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2021

Circadian Rhythm of NER and ATR Pathways.

Tae-Hong Kang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circadian clock and cancer.Military Medical Research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Transcription-Coupled Repair and R-Loop Crosstalk in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae-Hong KangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Korea.
Dong-A University · KR

Funding

Korea Breast Cancer Foundation KBCF-2020R001National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1D1A3B07043817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic integrity is constantly insulted by solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Adaptative cellular mechanisms called DNA damage responses comprising DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint, and apoptosis, are believed to be evolved to limit genomic instability according to the photoperiod during a day. As seen in many other key cellular metabolisms, genome surveillance mechanisms against genotoxic UV radiation are under the control of circadian clock systems, thereby exhibiting daily oscillations in their catalytic activities. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that nucleotide excision repair (NER), the sole DNA repair mechanism correcting UV-induced DNA photolesions, and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR)-mediated cell cycle checkpoint kinase are subjected to the robust control of the circadian clock. The molecular foundation for the circadian rhythm of UV-induced DNA damage responses in mammalian cells will be discussed.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmDNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsHumansUltraviolet RaysAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, human6-4 photoproduct (6-4 PP)ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR)chronotherapycircadian clockcyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)DNA damage responseDNA repairnucleotide excision repair (NER)ultraviolet radiation (UV)

Identifiers

PMID34064641
PMCPMC8150605
OpenAlexW3160896233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.