Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064457›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use in a Malaysian Tertiary Care University Hospital.

Nurul Adilla Hayat Jamaluddin, Petrick Periyasamy, Chee Lan Lau, Sasheela Ponnampalavanar, Pauline Siew Mei Lai, Ramliza Ramli, Toh Leong Tan, Najma Kori, Mei Kuen Yin, Nur Jannah Azman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nurul Adilla Hayat JamaluddinPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4099-9472
Petrick PeriyasamyMedical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Chee Lan LauPharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Sasheela PonnampalavanarDepartment of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Pauline Siew Mei LaiDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Ramliza RamliDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Toh Leong TanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6771-0141
Najma KoriMedical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Mei Kuen YinPharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Nur Jannah AzmanPharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Rodney JamesNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1425-029X
Karin ThurskyNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Isa Naina-MohamedPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Hospital Kuala Lumpur · MYUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MYNational University of Malaysia · MYPeter Doherty Institute · AUUniversity of Malaya · MYUniversity of Cyberjaya · MY

Funding

Pfizer 40867041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance remains a significant public health issue, and to a greater extent, caused by the misuse of antimicrobials. Monitoring and benchmarking antimicrobial use is critical for the antimicrobial stewardship team to enhance prudent use of antimicrobial and curb antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings. Employing a comprehensive and established tool, this study investigated the trends and compliance of antimicrobial prescribing in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Malaysia to identify potential target areas for quality improvement. A point prevalence survey method following the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) was used to collect detailed data on antimicrobial prescribing and assessed a set of quality indicators associated with antimicrobial use. The paper-based survey was conducted across 37 adult wards, which included all adult in-patients on the day of the survey to form the study population. Of 478 patients surveyed, 234 (49%) patients received at least one antimicrobial agent, with 357 antimicrobial prescriptions. The highest prevalence of antimicrobial use was within the ICU (80%). Agents used were mainly amoxicillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (14.8%), piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (10.6%) and third-generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone, 9.5%). Intravenous administration was ordered in 62.7% of prescriptions. Many antimicrobials were prescribed empirically (65.5%) and commonly prescribed for pneumonia (19.6%). The indications for antimicrobials were documented in the patients' notes for 80% of the prescriptions; however, the rate of review/stop date recorded must be improved (33.3%). One-half of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered for more than 24 h. From 280 assessable prescriptions, 141 (50.4%) were compliant with guidelines. Treating specialties, administration route, class of antimicrobial, and the number of prescriptions per patient were contributing factors associated with compliance. On multivariate analysis, administering non-oral routes of antimicrobial administration, and single antimicrobial prescription prescribed per patient was independently associated with non-compliance. NAPS can produce robust baseline information and identifying targets for improvement in antimicrobial prescribing in reference to current AMS initiatives within the tertiary care teaching hospital. The findings underscore the necessity to expand the AMS efforts towards reinforcing compliance, documentation, improving surgical prophylaxis prescribing practices, and updating local antibiotic guidelines.

Indexed as

antimicrobialcompliancepoint prevalenceprescribingrisk

Identifiers

PMID34064457
PMCPMC8148015
OpenAlexW3158997447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.