Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064220›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

The Contribution of Foods Prepared Outside the Home to the Diets of 18- to 30-Year-Old Australians: The MYMeals Study.

Lyndal Wellard-Cole, Alyse Davies, Juliana Chen, Jisu Jung, Kim B Bente, Judy Kay, Wendy L Watson, Clare Hughes, Anna Rangan, Kalina Yacef and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combo Deals, Junk Meals: A Systematic Review Examining the Healthiness of Foods Promoted on Meal Delivery Apps.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lyndal Wellard-ColeCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-2135
Alyse DaviesCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9448-7539
Juliana ChenCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jisu JungSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Kim B BenteSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Judy KaySchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Wendy L WatsonCancer Prevention and Advocacy Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-4064
Clare HughesCancer Prevention and Advocacy Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia.
Anna RanganCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1815-844X
Kalina YacefSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Irena KoprinskaSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Kathy ChapmanHeart Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia.
Nim Ting WongCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Luke GemmingCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Cliona Ni MhurchuNational Institute for Health Innovation, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-9167
Adrian BaumanPrevention Research Centre, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Margaret Allman-FarinelliCharles Perkins Centre, Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-1374
The University of Sydney · AUCancer Council NSW · AUNational Heart Foundation of Australia · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Australian Research Council LP150100831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young adults are the highest consumers of food prepared outside home (FOH) and gain most weight among Australian adults. One strategy to address the obesogenic food environment is menu labelling legislation whereby outlets with >20 stores in one state and >50 Australia-wide must display energy content in kJ. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of FOH to the energy and macronutrients, saturated fat, total sugars and sodium intakes of young Australians. One thousand and one 18 to 30-year-olds (57% female) residing in Australia's most populous state recorded all foods and beverages consumed and the location of preparation for three consecutive days using a purpose-designed smartphone application. Group means for the daily consumption of energy, percentage energy (%E) for protein, carbohydrate, total sugars, total and saturated fats, and sodium density (mg/1000 kJ) and proportions of nutrients from FOH from menu labelling and independent outlets were compared. Overall, participants consumed 42.4% of their energy intake from FOH with other nutrients ranging from 39.8% (sugars) to 47.3% (sodium). Independent outlets not required to label menus, contributed a greater percentage of energy (23.6%) than menu labelling outlets (18.7%,

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDietDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood LabelingFood ServicesHumansMaleNew South WalesNutrition Policyenergy-labellingfast-foodfood prepared outside the homemenu labellingnutritionsaturated fatsodiumsugaryoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34064220
PMCPMC8224325
OpenAlexW3165235635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.