Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064209›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kelly Holt, Imran Khan Niazi, Imran Amjad, Nitika Kumari, Usman Rashid, Jens Duehr, Muhammad Samran Navid, Muhammad Shafique, Heidi Haavik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelly HoltCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-7260
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Imran AmjadCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-0079
Nitika KumariCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5135-1682
Usman RashidFaculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-5493
Jens DuehrCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.
Muhammad Samran NavidCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-874X
Muhammad ShafiqueFaculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Riphah International University, Islamabad 46000, Pakistan.
Heidi HaavikCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-2085
New Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZRiphah International University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chiropractic spinal adjustments have been shown to result in short-term increases in muscle strength in chronic stroke patients, however, the effect of longer-term chiropractic spinal adjustments on people with chronic stroke is unknown. This exploratory study assessed whether 4 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments, combined with physical therapy (chiro + PT), had a greater impact than sham chiropractic with physical therapy (sham + PT) did on motor function (Fugl Meyer Assessment, FMA) in 63 subacute or chronic stroke patients. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life and other measures of functional mobility and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post-intervention), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models or generalized linear mixed models. A post-hoc responder analysis was performed to investigate the clinical significance of findings. At 4 weeks, there was a larger effect of chiro + PT, compared with sham + PT, on the FMA (difference = 6.1,

Indexed as

chiropractic spinal adjustmenthealth-related quality of lifemotor functionphysical therapyrecovery of functionstroke

Identifiers

PMID34064209
PMCPMC8224305
OpenAlexW3162874220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.