Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064202›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Active School Breaks and Students' Attention: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Álvaro Infantes-Paniagua, Ana Filipa Silva, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Hugo Sarmento, Francisco Tomás González-Fernández, Sixto González-Víllora, Filipe Manuel Clemente

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Álvaro Infantes-PaniaguaDepartment of Physical Education, Arts Education, and Music, Faculty of Education of Albacete, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3552-300X
Ana Filipa SilvaN2i, Polytechnic Institute of Maia, 4475-690 Maia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1772-1272
Rodrigo Ramirez-CampilloDepartment of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, 8320000 Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-3279
Hugo SarmentoUniversity of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-0642
Francisco Tomás González-FernándezCentro de Estudios Superiores Alberta Giménez, Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Pontifical University of Comillas, 07013 Palma, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-7521
Sixto González-VílloraDepartment of Physical Education, Arts Education, and Music, Faculty of Education of Cuenca, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 17071 Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-5223
Filipe Manuel ClementeEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-2842

Funding

Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes de Castilla-La Mancha cofinanciados por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) SBPLY/19/180501/000147Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades EST19/00498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School physical activity breaks are currently being proposed as a way to improve students' learning. However, there is no clear evidence of the effects of active school breaks on academic-related cognitive outcomes. The present systematic review with meta-analysis scrutinized and synthesized the literature related to the effects of active breaks on students' attention. On January 12th, 2021, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched for published interventions with counterbalanced cross-over or parallel-groups designs with a control group, including school-based active breaks, objective attentional outcomes, and healthy students of any age. Studies' results were qualitatively synthesized, and meta-analyses were performed if at least three study groups provided pre-post data for the same measure. Results showed some positive acute and chronic effects of active breaks on attentional outcomes (i.e., accuracy, concentration, inhibition, and sustained attention), especially on selective attention. However, most of the results were not significant. The small number of included studies and their heterogeneous design are the primary limitations of the present study. Although the results do not clearly point out the positive effects of active breaks, they do not compromise students' attention. The key roles of intensity and the leader of the active break are discussed. INPLASY registration number: 202110054.

Indexed as

arousalattentionattentional biascross-over studiesexercisemeta-analysisnon-randomized controlled trialsphysical activityrandomized controlled trialssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34064202
PMCPMC8224334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.