Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34064014›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Neural Estimator of Information for Time-Series Data with Dependency.

Sina Molavipour, Hamid Ghourchian, Germán Bassi, Mikael Skoglund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sina MolavipourSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-1217
Hamid GhourchianSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-8683
Germán BassiEricsson Research, 164 83 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8974-6591
Mikael SkoglundSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7926-5081

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2019-03606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel approaches to estimate information measures using neural networks are well-celebrated in recent years both in the information theory and machine learning communities. These neural-based estimators are shown to converge to the true values when estimating mutual information and conditional mutual information using independent samples. However, if the samples in the dataset are not independent, the consistency of these estimators requires further investigation. This is of particular interest for a more complex measure such as the directed information, which is pivotal in characterizing causality and is meaningful over time-dependent variables. The extension of the convergence proof for such cases is not trivial and demands further assumptions on the data. In this paper, we show that our neural estimator for conditional mutual information is consistent when the dataset is generated with samples of a stationary and ergodic source. In other words, we show that our information estimator using neural networks converges asymptotically to the true value with probability one. Besides universal functional approximation of neural networks, a core lemma to show the convergence is Birkhoff's ergodic theorem. Additionally, we use the technique to estimate directed information and demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in simulations.

Indexed as

conditional mutual informationdirected informationMarkov sourceneural networksvariational bound

Identifiers

PMID34064014
PMCPMC8224080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.