Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063855›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effect of Treatment with Antibiotics or Nutraceuticals on Clinical Activity and the Fecal Microbiome of Dogs with Acute Diarrhea.

Giulia Pignataro, Roberta Di Prinzio, Paolo Emidio Crisi, Benedetta Belà, Isa Fusaro, Carlo Trevisan, Luigi De Acetis, Alessandro Gramenzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A new highly digestible prescription diet containingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia PignataroFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.
Roberta Di PrinzioFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.
Paolo Emidio CrisiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-0059
Benedetta BelàFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.
Isa FusaroFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2532-7240
Carlo TrevisanVeterinary Practice, "Ambulatorio Veterinario Dr. Carlo Trevisan", 66016 Guardiagrele, CH, Italy.
Luigi De AcetisVeterinary Practice, "Ambulatorio Veterinario Dr. Luigi De Acetis", 65023 Caramanico Terme, PE, Italy.
Alessandro GramenziFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Guardiagrele, TE, Italy.
University of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs with acute diarrhea are often presented to clinical practice and, although this generally represents a self-limiting condition, antibiotics are still frequently used as treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects in dogs with acute non-hemorrhagic diarrhea of the administration of an antibiotic combination in comparison to a nutraceutical product. Thirty dogs were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: 15 dogs (group A) received a nutraceutical commercial product while 15 dogs (group B) received an antimicrobial combination of metronidazole and spiramycin. For each dog, the Canine Acute Diarrhea Severity Index, the fecal microbiota and the Dysbiosis Index were assessed. Both stool consistency and frequency decreased on day 2 in the dogs of group A compared to baseline, while in group B, these parameters significantly decreased at days 3 and 4. The global concern for rising antibiotic resistance associated with indiscriminate use of antimicrobials, in both humans and animals, suggests the necessity of avoiding empirical and injudicious use of these molecules in diarrheic dogs. These results suggest that the nutraceutical treatment had a similar clinical effect compared to the antibiotic formulation, representing a valid antibiotic-sparing therapeutic approach in canine acute diarrhea.

Indexed as

acute diarrheaantibiotic-sparing therapyantimicrobial resistanceCanine Acute Diarrhea Severity IndexdogDysbiosis Indexgut microbiotanutraceutical

Identifiers

PMID34063855
PMCPMC8223982
OpenAlexW3163977428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.