Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063825›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Influential Factors in Remote Monitoring of Heart Failure Patients: A Review of the Literature and Direction for Future Research.

Sashini Senarath, Geoff Fernie, Atena Roshan Fekr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sashini SenarathThe Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Geoff FernieThe Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Atena Roshan FekrThe Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) foundation grant FDN - 148450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With new advances in technology, remote monitoring of heart failure (HF) patients has become increasingly prevalent and has the potential to greatly enhance the outcome of care. Many studies have focused on implementing systems for the management of HF by analyzing physiological signals for the early detection of HF decompensation. This paper reviews recent literature exploring significant physiological variables, compares their reliability in predicting HF-related events, and examines the findings according to the monitored variables used such as body weight, bio-impedance, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiration rate. The reviewed studies identified correlations between the monitored variables and the number of alarms, HF-related events, and/or readmission rates. It was observed that the most promising results came from studies that used a combination of multiple parameters, compared to using an individual variable. The main challenges discussed include inaccurate data collection leading to contradictory outcomes from different studies, compliance with daily monitoring, and consideration of additional factors such as physical activity and diet. The findings demonstrate the need for a shared remote monitoring platform which can lead to a significant reduction of false alarms and help in collecting reliable data from the patients for clinical use especially for the prevention of cardiac events.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart RateHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory Ratedata fusionheart failureremote monitoringtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34063825
PMCPMC8196679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.