Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063699›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection among Healthcare Workers in Mexico: Case Report and Literature Review.

Brenda Garduño-Orbe, Juan Manuel Sánchez-Rebolledo, Mustafá Cortés-Rafael, Yuliana García-Jiménez, Marcelina Perez-Ortiz, Indira Rocío Mendiola-Pastrana, Eduardo López-Ortiz, Geovani López-Ortiz

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brenda Garduño-OrbeUnidad de Medicina Familiar Número 26, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 39700 Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8505-3528
Juan Manuel Sánchez-RebolledoUnidad de Medicina Familiar Número 26, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 39700 Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Mustafá Cortés-RafaelHospital General Regional No. 1 Vicente Guerrero, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 39610 Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Yuliana García-JiménezUnidad de Medicina Familiar Número 26, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 39700 Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Marcelina Perez-OrtizUnidad de Medicina Familiar Número 26, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 39700 Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Indira Rocío Mendiola-PastranaSubdivisión de Medicina Familiar, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Eduardo López-OrtizSubdivisión de Medicina Familiar, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Geovani López-OrtizSubdivisión de Medicina Familiar, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-0012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been multiple questions regarding reinfections associated with SARS-CoV-2. Healthcare workers on duty, due to overexposure in environments where there are more cases of COVID-19, are more prone to become infected by this virus. Here, we report 4 cases that meet the definition of clinical reinfection by SARS-CoV-2, as well as a literature review on this subject; all occurred in healthcare workers in Acapulco Guerrero, Mexico who provide their services in a hospital that cares for patients with COVID-19. The time between the manifestation of the first and second infection for each case was 134, 129, 107 and 82 days, all patients presented symptomatology in both events. The time between remission of the first infection and onset of second infection was 108, 109, 78 and 67 days for each case, while the time to confirmation by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between infections was 134, 124, 106 and 77 days. In two of the four cases the reinfection resulted in a more severe case, while in the remaining two cases the manifestation of symptoms and complications was similar to that presented in the first infection. Given this scenario, greater care is needed in the management of the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 to protect healthcare workers and the general public from risks and complications caused by a possible reinfection by SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Health PersonnelHumansMexicoPandemicsReinfectionclinical reinfectionCOVID-19healthcare workersreinfectionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34063699
PMCPMC8147850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.