Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063659›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Comparison of Different Materials for Self-Pressurized Vitrification of Feline Oocytes-First Results.

Lorena Fernandez-Gonzalez, Jan Huebinger, Katarina Jewgenow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena Fernandez-GonzalezDepartment of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, D-10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-3275
Jan HuebingerDepartment of Systemic Cell Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Str. 11, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Katarina JewgenowDepartment of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, D-10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-840X
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryobanking is a crucial part on species conservation. Nowadays, there is no suitable protocol for vitrification of feline oocytes. Self-pressurized rapid freezing of different cell types proved to mimic the advantages of high pressure freezing. As this method could also be applied for gamete rescue under field conditions, the aim here was to analyse the impact of self-pressurized vitrification on feline cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) and to determine the appropriate material. Therefore, COCs of domestic cat were randomly vitrified (n = 189) in metal tubes of different materials: Aluminium, silver, and titanium. No significant differences were found on oocytes' competence after thawing. On average, 44% of the COCs presented normal morphology and 48.2% of them showed a polar body after in vitro maturation (IVM) and were subsequently fertilised. Aluminium tubes were positive on toxicity tests, producing the lowest cleavage rates. Silver tubes showed no toxic effect, but the cleavage rate was lower than with titanium tubes, and a previous association with embryotoxicity and biological alterations makes us aware of its indiscriminate use. Titanium seems to be the only inert material of them, presenting a slightly higher maturation (55.6%) and cleavage (20%) rates. Nevertheless, more studies should follow to increase embryo competence after warming.

Indexed as

aluminiumcat oocytescryobankingfelidshigh pressure freezingICSIself-pressurized rapid freezingsilvertitanium

Identifiers

PMID34063659
PMCPMC8147606
OpenAlexW3159065225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.