ArticlePolymers2021
Toxic or Not Toxic, That Is the Carbon Quantum Dot's Question: A Comprehensive Evaluation with Zebrafish Embryo, Eleutheroembryo, and Adult Models.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle Clearance and New Horizons in Engineered Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Carbon Quantum Dots as Versatile Nanosystems for Biomedical Innovation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Translational Prospects.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Targeted Drug Delivery Strategies in Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance: Advances and Future Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Exploring Oxidative Stress Mechanisms of Nanoparticles Using Zebrafish (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Green carbon dots in the era of AI: sustainable synthesis, intelligent drug delivery, advanced diagnostics, and bioimaging.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
- Toxicity assessment and bioimaging potential of carbon dots synthesized from banana peel in zebrafish model.Narra J · 2024Article
- A Comparison of Common Quantum Dot Alternatives to Cadmium-Based Quantum Dots on the Basis of Liver Cytotoxicity.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Emerging Trends in Nanomedicine: Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Healthcare.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Myeloperoxidase enzyme-catalyzed breakdown of zero-dimension carbon quantum dots.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- An Overview of the Potential of Food-Based Carbon Dots for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Recent developments, applications and challenges for carbon quantum dots as a photosynthesis enhancer in agriculture.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Cytotoxicity of Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, Fullerenes, and Dots.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Carbon Dots: Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- New Insights into the Cellular Toxicity of Carbon Quantum Dots toAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Milk-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots: Study of Biological and Chemical Properties Provides Evidence of Toxicity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multifunctional carbonized nanogels to treat lethal acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- Carbon dots for virus detection and therapy.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) are emerging novel nanomaterials with a wide range of applications and high biocompatibility. However, there is a lack of in-depth research on whether CQDs can cause acute or long-term adverse reactions in aquatic organisms. In this study, two different types of CQDs prepared by ammonia citrate and spermidine, namely CQD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.