Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063438›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials.

Agnese Gugliandolo, Luigia Fonticoli, Oriana Trubiani, Thangavelu S Rajan, Guya D Marconi, Placido Bramanti, Emanuela Mazzon, Jacopo Pizzicannella, Francesca Diomede

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Agnese GugliandoloDepartment of Experimental Neurology, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Luigia FonticoliDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Oriana TrubianiDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7459-4898
Thangavelu S RajanDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641021, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8728-6176
Guya D MarconiDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-4653
Placido BramantiDepartment of Experimental Neurology, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Emanuela MazzonDepartment of Experimental Neurology, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Jacopo Pizzicannella"Ss. Annunziata" Hospital, ASL 02 Lanciano-Vasto-Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Francesca DiomedeDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0384-6509

Funding

ex60% Research Funds OT60/2018, FD60/2020 and GDM60/2019Ministero della Salute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, tissue engineering has become one of the most studied medical fields. Even if bone shows self-remodeling properties, in some cases, due to injuries or anomalies, bone regeneration can be required. In particular, oral bone regeneration is needed in the dentistry field, where the functional restoration of tissues near the tooth represents a limit for many dental implants. In this context, the application of biomaterials and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) appears promising for bone regeneration. This review focused on in vivo studies that evaluated bone regeneration using biomaterials with MSCs. Different biocompatible biomaterials were enriched with MSCs from different sources. These constructs showed an enhanced bone regenerative power in in vivo models. However, we discussed also a future perspective in tissue engineering using the MSC secretome, namely the conditioned medium and extracellular vesicles. This new approach has already shown promising results for bone tissue regeneration in experimental models.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCulture Media, ConditionedHumansRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCulture Media, Conditionedbiocompatibilitybiomaterialsdentistryregenerative medicinescaffoldtissue engineeringtissue repair

Identifiers

PMID34063438
PMCPMC8156243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.