ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2021
Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.
Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relation Between Anaerobic Power and Competitive Performance in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- The Applied Sport Science and Medicine of Powerlifting and Para Powerlifting: A Systematic Scoping Review with Recommendations for Future Research.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Asymmetry of Muscle Activation and Strength in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- Variability analysis of muscle activation symmetry to identify indicators of individual motor strategy: a case series on elite Paralympic powerlifters.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Exercise Evaluation and Prescription-Second Edition.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2022Article
- Validation of an Automatic Inertial Sensor-Based Methodology for Detailed Barbell Velocity Monitoring during Maximal Paralympic Bench Press.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Bibliometrics-Enhanced, PAGER-Compliant Scoping Review of the Literature on Paralympic Powerlifting: Insights for Practices and Future Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Post-Training Hypotensor Effect in Paralympic and Conventional Powerlifting.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021Article
- Analysis of Grip Amplitude on Velocity in Paralympic Powerlifting.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Training with Elastic Bands on Strength and Fatigue Indicators in Paralympic Powerlifting.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sticking region is considered an intervening factor in the performance of the bench press with high loads.
objectiveTo evaluate the strength indicators in the sticking point region in Powerlifting Paralympic athletes.
methodsTwelve Brazilian Powerlifting Paralympic athletes performed maximum isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), time at MIF, velocity, dynamic time in sticking, and surface electromyography in several distances from the bar to the chest.
resultsFor velocity, there was a difference between the pre-sticking and sticking region (1.98 ± 0.32 and 1.30 ± 0.43,
conclusionsThe maximum isometric force, rate of force development, time, velocity, and dynamic time had lower values, especially in the initial and intermediate phases in the sticking region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.