Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063281›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

The Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine in China: Insights from Protection Motivation Theory.

Lu Li, Jian Wang, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Anli Leng, Rugang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lu LiSchool of Business Administration, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce, Nanjing 211168, China.
Jian WangDong Fureng Economic and Social Development School, Wuhan University, Beijing 100010, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-7928
Stephen NicholasAustralian National Institute of Management and Commerce, Eveleigh, Sydney, NSW 2015, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7105
Elizabeth MaitlandSchool of Management, University of Liverpool, Chatham Building, Chatham Street, Liverpool L697ZH, UK.
Anli LengSchool of Political Science and Public Administration, Institute of Governance, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6775-2085
Rugang LiuSchool of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-9507
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare · AUJiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce · CNNanjing Medical University · CNShandong University · CNUniversity of Liverpool · GBWuhan University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M662392National Natural Science Foundation of China 71904089Qingdao Postdoctoral Foundation no
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: More coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are gradually being developed and marketed. Improving the vaccination intention will be the key to increasing the vaccination rate in the future; (2) Methods: A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect data on COVID-19 vaccination intentions, protection motivation and control variables. Pearson Chi-square test and multivariate ordered logistic regression models were specified to analyze the determinants of intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine; (3) Results: Although the vaccine was free, 17.75% of the 2377 respondents did not want, or were hesitant, to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Respondents' cognition of vaccine safety, external reward and response efficacy were positively related to COVID-19 vaccination intention, while age, income and response cost were negatively related to the intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Professionals and people without medical insurance had the lowest intention to vaccinate; (4) Conclusions: The older aged, people without health insurance, those with higher incomes and professionals should be treated as the key intervention targets. Strengthening publicity and education about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, training vaccinated people and community leaders as propagandists for the vaccine, and improving the accessibility to the COVID-19 vaccine are recommended to improve COVID-19 vaccination intention.

Indexed as

COVID-19determinantintentionprotection motivation theoryvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34063281
PMCPMC8147465
OpenAlexW3159386692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.