Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34063122›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Current Status of Brain Tumor in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Application of Nanobiotechnology for Its Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Afrasim Moin, Syed Mohd Danish Rizvi, Talib Hussain, D V Gowda, Gehad M Subaiea, Mustafa M A Elsayed, Mukhtar Ansari, Abulrahman Sattam Alanazi, Hemant Yadav

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Afrasim MoinDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-1162
Syed Mohd Danish RizviDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3106-4707
Talib HussainDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
D V GowdaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru 570015, India.
Gehad M SubaieaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Mustafa M A ElsayedDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Mukhtar AnsariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Abulrahman Sattam AlanaziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Hemant YadavDepartment of Pharmaceutics, RAK College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, RAK Medical & Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah 11172, United Arab Emirates.
University of Ha'il · SAJSS Academy of Higher Education and Research · INRas al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University · AE

Funding

University of Hail RG-191325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrain tumors are the most challenging of all tumors and accounts for about 3% of all cancer allied deaths. The aim of the present review is to examine the brain tumor prevalence and treatment modalities available in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It also provides a comprehensive analysis of the application of various nanotechnology-based products for brain cancer treatments along with their prospective future advancements.

methodsA literature review was performed to identify and summarize the current status of brain cancer in Saudi Arabia and the scope of nanobiotechnology in its treatment.

resultsDepending upon the study population data analysis, gliomas, astrocytoma, meningioma, and metastatic cancer have a higher incidence rate in Saudi Arabia than in other countries, and are mostly treated in accordance with conventional treatment modalities for brain cancer. Due to the poor prognosis of cancer, it has an average survival rate of 2 years. Conventional therapy includes surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and a combination thereof, but these do not control the disease's recurrence. Among the various nanomaterials discussed, liposomes and polymeric nanoformulations have demonstrated encouraging outcomes for facilitated brain cancer treatment.

conclusionsNanomaterials possess the capacity to overcome the shortcomings of conventional therapies. Polymer-based nanomaterials have shown encouraging outcomes against brain cancer when amalgamated with other nano-based therapies. Nonetheless, nanomaterials could be devised that possess minimal toxicity towards normal cells or that specifically target tumor cells. In addition, rigorous clinical investigations are warranted to prepare them as an efficient and safe modality for brain cancer therapy.

Indexed as

brain cancergliomasnanobiotechnologypolymeric nanomaterialsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34063122
PMCPMC8148129
OpenAlexW3158542991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.