Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062949›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Primary Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: Similarities, Differences and Phenocopies.

Riccardo Vio, Annalisa Angelini, Cristina Basso, Alberto Cipriani, Alessandro Zorzi, Paola Melacini, Gaetano Thiene, Alessandra Rampazzo, Domenico Corrado, Chiara Calore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evidence for chronic inflammation in cats with cardiomyopathies.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Dysfunctional sarcomeric relaxation in the heart.Current opinion in physiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. ATTR Epidemiology, Genetics, and Prognostic Factors.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Riccardo VioDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-1514
Annalisa AngeliniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-4488
Cristina BassoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0195-9753
Alberto CiprianiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-6202
Alessandro ZorziDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-0583
Paola MelaciniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Gaetano ThieneDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8814-2577
Alessandra RampazzoDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3884-8843
Domenico CorradoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Chiara CaloreDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and primary restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) have a similar genetic background as they are both caused mainly by variants in sarcomeric genes. These "sarcomeric cardiomyopathies" also share diastolic dysfunction as the prevalent pathophysiological mechanism. Starting from the observation that patients with HCM and primary RCM may coexist in the same family, a characteristic pathophysiological profile of HCM with restrictive physiology has been recently described and supports the hypothesis that familiar forms of primary RCM may represent a part of the phenotypic spectrum of HCM rather than a different genetic cardiomyopathy. To further complicate this scenario some infiltrative (amyloidosis) and storage diseases (Fabry disease and glycogen storage diseases) may show either a hypertrophic or restrictive phenotype according to left ventricular wall thickness and filling pattern. Establishing a correct etiological diagnosis among HCM, primary RCM, and hypertrophic or restrictive phenocopies is of paramount importance for cascade family screening and therapy.

Indexed as

amyloidosiscardiomyopathiesFabry diseasegeneticsglycogen storage diseasesheart failurehypertrophic cardiomyopathyrestrictive cardiomyopathyrestrictive physiology

Identifiers

PMID34062949
PMCPMC8125617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.