Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062833›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

Effects of Organic Fertilizers on the Soil Microorganisms Responsible for N

Cristina Lazcano, Xia Zhu-Barker, Charlotte Decock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbial communities in the rhizosphere of tropical soils cultivated with maize as a function of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digestate Improves Stinging Nettle (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina LazcanoDepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-481X
Xia Zhu-BarkerDepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Charlotte DecockNatural Resources Management and Environmental Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.

Funding

BLSA POPULATION DYNAMICSZ01AG000624 · NIA · AGING · PI FOZARD, J L · 1990 to 1998
–
California Department of Food and Agriculture 17-0624-000-HS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of organic fertilizers constitutes a sustainable strategy to recycle nutrients, increase soil carbon (C) stocks and mitigate climate change. Yet, this depends largely on balance between soil C sequestration and the emissions of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N

Indexed as

compostdenitrificationfertilizersmanureN cyclenitrification

Identifiers

PMID34062833
PMCPMC8147359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.