Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062795›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Are the Acute Effects of THC Different in Aging Adults?

Raeghan L Mueller, Jarrod M Ellingson, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. The Use of Compounds Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurological diseases: a clinical update.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Neurocognitive Effects of Cannabis Across the Lifespan.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raeghan L MuellerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-1532
Jarrod M EllingsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-2656
L Cinnamon BidwellInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-7586
Angela D BryanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Kent E HutchisonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS DA039707A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years of expanding legalization, older adults have reported the largest increase in cannabis use of any age group. While its use has been studied extensively in young adults, little is known about the effects of THC in older adults and whether the risks of cannabis might be different, particularly concerning intoxication and cognition. The current study investigated whether age is associated with the deleterious effects of THC on cognitive performance and other behavioral measures before and after ad libitum self-administration of three different types of cannabis flower (THC dominant, THC + CBD, and CBD dominant). Age groups consisted of young adults (ages 21-25) and older adults (ages 55-70). Controlling for pre-use scores on all measures, the THC dominant chemovar produced a greater deleterious effect in younger adults compared with older adults in tests of learning and processing speed, whereas there were no differences between old and young in the effects of the other chemovars. In addition, the young group reported greater cannabis craving than the older group after using the THC chemovar. Consistent with some reports in the preclinical literature, the findings suggest that older adults may be less sensitive to the effects of THC on cognitive and affective measures.

Indexed as

aging adultscannabiscognition

Identifiers

PMID34062795
PMCPMC8147270
OpenAlexW3160712571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.