Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34062351›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2021

Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on Ara h 1 in peanut sprouts.

Miao Yu, Yuetong Zhou, Xiaohe Wang, Mengxi Xie, Baiqing Zhang, Haiqiu Yu, Zhanxiang Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miao YuInstitute of Food and Processing, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China; Food Science College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; Agronomy College of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Yuetong ZhouFood Science College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Xiaohe WangInstitute of Food and Processing, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China.
Mengxi XieInstitute of Food and Processing, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China.
Baiqing ZhangFood Science College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Haiqiu YuAgronomy College of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China. Electronic address: yuhaiqiu@syau.edu.cn.
Zhanxiang SunInstitute of Food and Processing, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China. Electronic address: sunzx67@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ara h 1 is the most abundant sensitizing protein in peanuts; it has high thermal stability and is difficult to degrade. The peanut sprout is a high-quality, natural food that has various beneficial effects and lower allergenicity than peanut seeds. In this study, ultrasonication (US) of peanut sprouts was used to alter their Ara h 1 content. We determined that the optimal parameters for the US process were 35 °C temperature, 30 min duration, 240 W power, and 100 kHz frequency. After 5 days of germination, the protease activity of the control (blank) group increased to 262.39 ± 0.10 U, whereas that of the US group increased to 290.1 ± 0.25 U. We also investigated the effects of US on Ara h 1 protein composition, structure, and related gene expression during germination. ELISA results showed that after 5 days of germination, Ara h 1 content in the blank group decreased from 20.63 ± 0.31 ppm to 3.35 ± 0.42 ppm, whereas in the US group, they decreased to below the detection limit. SDS-PAGE bands between 50 and 70 kDa from peanut sprout extracts gradually became lighter in both groups. The band almost disappeared at day 5 of germination in the US group, indicating that US reduced the Ara h 1 content of peanut sprouts, consistent with the ELISA results. The expression of the Ara h 1 gene in peanut seeds was 173.92 ± 26.37. In the BK control group, it decreased to 0.49 ± 0.17 on the fourth day and increased slightly to 0.75 ± 0.09 on the fifth day. In the US group, it decreased to 1.37 ± 0.28 on the first day, dropped sharply to 0.00 on the third day, and increased slightly to 0.04 ± 0.01 on the fourth and fifth days. Protein structure results showed that the α-helix structure of Ara h 1 decreased after US, whereas the content of β-fold structures increased. The surface hydrophobicity decreased, and the secondary and tertiary structures of Ara h 1 were loose.

Indexed as

SonicationAntigens, PlantArachisFood HandlingHot TemperatureMembrane ProteinsPlant ProteinsSeedsAntigens, PlantAra h 1 protein, Arachis hypogaeaMembrane ProteinsPlant ProteinsAllergen Ara h 1Peanut sproutsUltrasonication

Identifiers

PMID34062351
PMCPMC8178124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.